Legal Opinion

Plunkett & Cooney, Pc v. Capitol Bancorp Ltd

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 25, 1995No. Docket 159094PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarkman, J.

Capitol Bancorp Ltd. (hereafter defendant) appeals as of right from a judgment awarding plaintiff Plunkett & Cooney, P.C. (Plunkett) $36,924.33 plus costs, interest, and attorney fees as compensation for legal services rendered. This appeal concerns a dispute over whether Plunkett is entitled to legal fees for services rendered by John Sharp, a former Plunkett attorney, while he was employed by the firm. We reverse.

Sharp, while affiliated with Plunkett, first met with defendant’s president, Joseph Reid, in 1988. The meeting was engendered by a request from Reid to a senior Plunkett…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fracasse v. BrentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Ambrose v. the Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Rippey v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Morris v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Ecclestone, Moffett & Humphrey, PC v. Ogne, Jinks, Alberts & Stuart, PCMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Keywell & Rosenfeld v. BithellMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Galanis v. Lyons & TruittIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  3. McQueen, Rains & Tresch, LLP v. CITGO Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
  4. Reynolds v. PolenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Souden v. SoudenMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API