State v. Alderman
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Information for theft of copper ingots, brought to the Superior Court in New Haven County and tried to the jury before Shumway, J.; verdict and judgment of guilty, and appeal by the accused.
1Opinion of the CourtRoraback, J.
The information contains five counts, each charging the commission of a different offense at Waterbury in 1909. The record of this case discloses thirty reasons of appeal, one being that the court erred in denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial upon the ground that the verdict was contrary to the law and the evidence. An examination of the evidence reported shows that there was evidence before the jury which, if believed by them, justified their verdict. It is apparent that there could not have been any serious controversy as to the fact that the property described in the several…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kirby v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Burr v. HartySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902
- State v. WardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1881
- Commonwealth v. WilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
- Berman v. KlingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. MoynahanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- State v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- State v. GrahamConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- State v. PambianchiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- State v. PalkimasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.