Legal Opinion
United States v. William O. Steele, Cross-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided June 25, 1999No. 94-3139PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BIRCH, Circuit Judge:
William O. Steele appeals his conviction for dispensing controlled substances in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and the government cross-appeals the district court’s application of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. Steele argues that his conviction must be vacated on three grounds: (1) the indictment was insufficient to allow him to prepare a defense and protect against double jeopardy; (2) the government improperly used its peremptory strikes based on gender; and (3) insufficient evidence existed to support his conviction. The government argues that the district court…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- J. E. B. v. Alabama ex rel. T. B.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- JEB v. Alabama Ex Rel. TBSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. William O. Steele, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Alberto CalderonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- United States v. McNairCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Keith Bernard Crenshaw, United States of America v. Kamil Hakeem Johnson, United States of America v. Timothy Kevin McGruderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. PeaseCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- United States v. James Scott PendergraftCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.