Legal Opinion
United States v. William O. Steele, Cross-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided July 29, 1998No. 94-3139PublishedCited by 327 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARNES, Circuit Judge:
William O. Steele, a pharmacist, was indicted for “knowingly and intentionally dispensing]” controlled substances “in violation of Title 21, United States Code, Section 841(a)(1).” The governing statute provides an exception which permits pharmacists and other “practitioners” to dispense controlled substances “to the extent authorized by their registration and in conformity with other provisions of this subchapter,” 21 U.S.C. § 822(b), which for present purposes means “in the course of professional practice,” 21 U.S.C. § 802(21).
We granted en banc review to decide…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Merritt v. Dillard Paper CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- United States v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. VuitchSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by327 opinions
- Shotz v. City of Plantation, FLCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Cheryl Cohen, on Behalf of Herself and Others Similarly Situated v. Office Depot, Inc., a Florida CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- John Angus Wright v. Sec. For the Dept. of Correc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Harris v. GarnerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- Jackson v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
322 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.