Legal Opinion

McCune v. Oregon Senior Services Division

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided September 9, 1986No. Civ. 83-6332-EPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PANNER, Chief Judge:

Plaintiffs and defendants moved for summary judgment on a number of issues. The motions were denied. Plaintiffs then asked the court to resolve six issues before trial, contending the issues were legal ones that could be decided as a matter of law. I treated these motions as motions to reconsider denial of the summary judgment motions, and granted and denied both motions in part. Plaintiffs then moved to reconsider, attaching additional affidavits and videotape evidence. The motion is denied.

This opinion supplements my earlier oral decision, and resolves the motion…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,588 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Stephen MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  5. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,468 Ernest C. Hector v. Herman Wiens, Individually and Dba Wiens Feed LotCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Guerrero v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. Rosa Salyer v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation and Wesley Trimble, AdministratorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  3. Terwilliger v. Home of Hope, Inc.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1998
  4. Toth v. Green River Regional Mental Health/Mental Retardation Board, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1989
  5. Bowler v. Deseret Village Ass'n, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API