Legal Opinion

Toth v. Green River Regional Mental Health/Mental Retardation Board, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided September 29, 1989No. Civ. A. C-84-0320-0PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

SILER, Chief Judge.

This action is before the Court on defendant’s, Green River Regional Mental Health/Mental Retardation Board, Inc.’s (Green River), motion for partial summary judgment. The issue presented to the Court is whether the plaintiffs, who are Alternate Living Unit (ALU) providers, are exempt from the Fair Labor Standards Act pursuant to 29 U.S.C. Section 213(a)(15). For the following reasons, Green River’s motion for partial summary judgment will be granted.

I. FACTS

Green River employs the plaintiffs as ALU providers. They belong to a program designed to keep mentally…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Bonnette v. California Health & Welfare AgencyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1981
  3. Bonnette v. California Health and Welfare AgencyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1976
  4. McCune v. Oregon Senior Services DivisionDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1986

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Carol Cox v. Acme Health Services, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  2. Cummings v. Bost, Inc.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2016
  3. Rosa Salyer v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation and Wesley Trimble, AdministratorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  4. Terwilliger v. Home of Hope, Inc.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1998
  5. Bowler v. Deseret Village Ass'n, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API