Legal Opinion

People v. Murphy

California Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1963No. Crim. No. 7224PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

Defendants Don M. Murphy and Dianna Kay Hargrove appeal from judgments of conviction entered upon jury verdicts finding each to be guilty of one count of pimping (Pen. Code, § 266h) and two counts of statutory rape (id., §261, subd. 1). Defendants were sentenced to state prison on all three counts.

Defendants’ principal grounds of attack are that the trial court committed prejudicial error (1) in denying their motion for a continuance by reason of surprise when the People amended the information in an assertedly material respect on the morning of trial, and (2) in unduly restricting the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. In Re HessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. In Re NewbernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. People v. SarazzawskiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  5. People v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. People v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Ballard v. Superior Court of San Diego CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. People v. MattsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. People v. ChaddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API