Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Railroad

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1893PublishedCited by 26 opinions

EROM WASHINGTON. Appeal from Chancery Court of "Washington County. Jno. P. Smith, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtWilkes, J.

The complainants are railroad contractors, and .constructed the Charleston, Cincinnati .and Chicago Railroad across the State of Tennessee, and some portions of the line beyond the limits of the State. They made their contract for construction with the Massachusetts and Southern Construction Company. The latter is incorporated under the laws of Massachusetts, to construct railroads, and specially this line of road, and had a ■capital stock of $250,000.

Complainants filed their bill to have a lien declared in their favor upon the line of railroad constructed by them in Tennessee, and to have…

2Cited by26 opinions

  1. Dale v. Thomas H. Temple Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Horn v. Pere Marquette R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1907
  3. Southern Const. Co. v. HalliburtonTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Oriental Investment Co. v. BarclayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1901
  5. Starks v. BrowningCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API