Icon Health and Fitness, Inc. v. Strava, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Concurring-in-part and dissenting-in-part opinion filed by Circuit Judge O’MALLEY.
WALLACH, Circuit Judge.
Appellees Strava, Inc. and UA Connected ' Fitness, Inc. (together; “Strava”) sought inter partes reexamination of several claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,789,800 (“the ’800 patent”). During the reexamination, certain claims were cancelled, and others (claims 38-100) were added. An examiner at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) found certain claims obvious over various prior art references. Appellant Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. (“Icon”) appealed the Examiner’s findings to the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- In Re Robert J. Gartside and Richard C. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Ericsson Inc. v. Tcl Communication TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- HTC Corp. v. Cellular Communications Equipment, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Elbit Systems of America, LLC v. Thales Visionix, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Fastship, LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Rovalma, S.A. v. Bohler-Edelstahl Gmbh & Co. KgCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.