Goldschmidt v. Maier
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from Superior Court, Los Angeles County; W. P. Fitzgerald, Judge. Action by Max Goldschmidt against Joseph Maier and another. From á judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.
1Per curiam
The plaintiff appeals from the judgment and from an order denying a new trial. In May, 1897, Mclnnis Bros, were the owners of a liquor saloon conducted in a leased' building in Los Angeles, and, as found by the court, were then indebted to the copartners of Goldschmidt Bros, in the sum of $1,115.36, and to said corporation in the sum of $1,500; that said Mclnnis Bros., for the purpose of paying said indebtedness, proposed to said Goldschmidt Bros, and the defendants that they would transfer to them *164all their interest in said property and business; said creditors, Goldschmidt Bros, and the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Chetwood v. California National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- People v. Van NessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Balch v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kremen v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Vuich v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Whayne v. SeamansSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923