Legal Opinion

People v. Van Ness

California Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1889No. 11621PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

—Action on the official bond of the defendant Van Ness, as commissioner of immigration of the port of San Francisco.

The bond on which this action was brought bears date on the 11th of January, 1876, on which day it was signed by Van Ness as principal, and Henry Barroilhet and Leland Stanford as sureties, was approved by the governor on the next day, and filed and recorded on the next day in the office of the secretary of state.

Van Ness held the office of commissioner of immigration from the seventh day of January, 1876, to the 21st of January, 1880.

During the incumbency of Van Ness,his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Liptrot v. HolmesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1846
  2. Dodge v. MeyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Cobb v. DowsNew York Supreme Court · 1850
  4. Bd. of Supervisors of Sacramento v. BirdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Finley v. Territory of Oklahoma Ex Rel. KeysSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
  2. State v. PorterNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  3. State Ex Rel. Wallace v. CallowMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Parker v. LawsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  5. Adkins v. KalterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API