Legal Opinion

Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. v. Turner

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 12, 1925PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYarser, J.

Tbe first attack on tbe validity of tbe default judgment against E. H. Turner is tbat chapter 520, Public-Local Laws, creating tbe Eorsytb County Court, is unconstitutional, and, therefore, tbe court itself is a nullity.

Tbis motion to declare itself out of existence was addressed to tbe Forsyth County Court. Tbis presents an anomalous situation. A court, as such, is asked to declare that it has no legal existence. This cannot be done. The court would first have to decide that it is a court in order to entertain the motion. Then, when the motion is considered, having already determined that it…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Liverpool, New York & Philadelphia Steamship Co. v. Commissioners of EmigrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Person v. DoughtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  3. St. George v. . HardieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  4. State v. Hall.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  5. Smith v. . WoodingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Lutz Industries, Inc. v. Dixie Home StoresSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. City of Monroe v. NivenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Harrell v. . WelsteadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  4. State v. TranthamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. State v. HeitzIdaho Supreme Court · 1951

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API