Smick v. Burnup & Sims
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtGreen, J.
Skyler Smick appeals a summary judgment dismissing his complaint for personal injuries against Burnup & Sims. In granting summary judgment, the court ruled as a matter of law that since Mr. Smick was an employee of Burnup & Sims, his action was barred by the workers' compensation act. The sole question on appeal is whether Mr. Smick's employee status presented a question of material fact. We reverse and remand for trial.
Mr. Smick was employed by Cox Cable T.V. as a warehouse supervisor. Burnup & Sims was hired to construct the cable network for Cox. When not busy with his own job, Mr. Smick…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bernethy v. Walt Failor's, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1982
- Novenson v. Spokane Culvert & Fabricating Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1979
- Fisher v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- Nyman v. MacRae Bros. Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1966
- Marsland v. Bullitt Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Manor v. Nestle Food Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
- Stocker v. SHELL OIL COMPANYWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Great West Casualty Co. v. BergesonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Jackson v. HarveyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
- Stelter v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.