Legal Opinion

Monarch Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Genser

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 19, 1977PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kentz, J. S. C.

During the trial of the issues in this mortgage foreclosure action, plaintiff Monarch Federal Savings and Loan Association (Monarch) requested that certain computer records bo admitted into evidence under the business records exception to the hearsay rule, Evid. R. 63(13). Defendants Lena Genser and Sidney Genser1 (Gensers) objected to their admission on the ground that plaintiff failed to lay the necessary foundation. Plaintiff produced three *114foundation witnesses and their testimony may be summarized as follows.

The first witness, Richard De Russo, assistant vice-president of…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. United States v. Stephen G. Scholle, United States of America v. Michael S. NeedhamCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  2. Ed Guth Realty, Inc. v. GingoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. United States v. Richard Allen De GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  4. State v. HodgesonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
  5. United States v. Joseph RussoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Minnich v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  2. Minnich v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  3. Monarch Federal Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. GenserNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API