Ed Guth Realty, Inc. v. Gingold
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtGabrielli, J.
The primary question raised by these cross appeals in these so-called inequality proceedings brought under article 7 of the Real Property Tax Law concerns the kind of proof which can properly form the basis for determination of the ratio of assessed value to fair market value as provided under subdivision 3 of section 720 of the Real Property Tax Law. The years in question are 1964 through 1970. 1
There is a two-step process in proving an inequality case. The petitioner must prove a proper ratio of assessed value to fair market value, and then he must establish the fair market value of his…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People ex rel. Yaras v. KinnawNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
3Cited by97 opinions
- W. T. Grant Co. v. SrogiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Rokowsky v. Finance AdministratorNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- People v. KennedyNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Hellerstein v. Assessor of IslipNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- 860 Executive Towers, Inc. v. Board of AssessorsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.