Legal Opinion

United States v. Richard Allen De Georgia

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 11, 1969No. 23835PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMLEY, Circuit Judge.

Richard Allen De Georgia appeals from a judgment of conviction, entered on a jury verdict, for violating 18 U.S.C. § 2312 (Dyer Act). The offense involved a 1968 Mustang automobile allegedly stolen from the Hertz Corporation, in New York City, and thereafter driven to Tucson, Arizona. The car was recovered from De Georgia on September 9, 1968.

Defendant first contends that his written confession, which was received in evidence, should have been excluded because prior to making that confession he was not properly advised of his rights under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. F. L. McClanahan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  5. John Milton Phillips, Jr., Jack Cecil Cherbo and Richard Dale Walker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. State v. WarnerOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. United States v. Luis Salgado (99-5645) Wilfredo Jambu (99-5651)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  3. United States v. BaxterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  4. United States v. H. David Miller, United States of America v. Continental Fuel Co., Inc., United States of America v. Don A. BliesnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  5. United States v. Stephen G. Scholle, United States of America v. Michael S. NeedhamCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API