Minnich v. First National Bank
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1DissentSmith, Judge
An initial glaring misconception on the part of the majority is evidenced by its focus on the timing of the appellee’s act of photocopying its bank record. "[T]hat the microfilm was made within a reasonable time after the preparation of the statement,” that "a suitable photocopy of a microfilm of the monthly statement [was] made contemporaneously with the mailing of that statement each month to Minnich” are circumstances which, assuming arguendo they were proven at trial, have absolutely nothing to do with the issue on appeal. (Emphasis supplied.) Rather, the question before this court is…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Martin v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
- Cotton v. John W. Eshelman & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Smith v. Bank of the SouthCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Harris v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Logan v. GradyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.