Heraeus-Amersil, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
Carman, Judge:
This action is before the Court on plaintiffs motion for summary judgment. The parties agree that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact.
Plaintiff contends that its imported merchandise, known as "fused quartz” or "fused silica,” should be classified under items 540.11 and 540.41 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS). The basis of plaintiffs claim is that the more than 300 known liquidations of entries over a 10 year period of like or similar merchandise classified under the same claimed item numbers constitutes "an established and uniform practice”…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ditbro Pearl Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
- Heraeus-Amersil, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
- Siemens America, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
- Rank Precision Industries, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
3Cited by2 opinions
- Heraeus-Amersil, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985
- United States v. PeeplesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993