Legal Opinion
Ditbro Pearl Co. v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided May 15, 1975No. 74-28, C.A.D. 1152PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Baldwin, Judge.
This is an appeal from the judgment of the United States Customs Court, 72 Cust. Ct. 1, C.D. 4497 (1974), overruling appellant’s claim for classification of certain aluminum chain belts as other chains, item 652.38 TSUS. The opinion of the Customs Court, familiarity with which is assumed, appears at 72 Cust. Ct. 1, C.D. 4497 (1974). The court held that the imported merchandise was properly classified by the District Director of Customs as jewelry and other items of personal adornment, item 740.38 TSUS. We affirm.
*96The trial court found that the evidence fully supports the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Borneo Sumatra Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- Asiatic Petroleum Corp. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Martin Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
- Ditbro Pearl Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1974
- Salentine & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
3Cited by16 opinions
- Heraeus-Amersil, Inc., Appellee/cross-Appellant v. The United States, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Heraeus-Amersil, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985
- Amersham Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
- Heraeus-Amersil, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
- International Light Metals, a Division of Martin Marietta Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.