Legal Opinion
United States v. Peeples
United States Court of International Trade
Decided April 30, 1993No. Court No. 93-01-00066Published
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Musgrave, Judge:
Defendant has moved for an order to strike the amended complaint and to make the amended complaint more definite and certain. Plaintiff opposes this motion. Defendant also has moved for leave of the Court to file a response to plaintiffs Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for a More Definite Statement and Motion to Strike. Plaintiff did not respond to defendant’s latter motion.
*327A portion of defendant’s earlier Motion to Strike and Motion to Make More Definite and Certain alleges that part of paragraph 13 of Plaintiffs Amended Petition should be…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stabilisierungsfonds Fur Wein v. Kaiser Stuhl Wine Distributors Pty. Ltd.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Heraeus-Amersil, Inc., Appellee/cross-Appellant v. The United States, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Jimlar Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- Heraeus-Amersil, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985
- Heraeus-Amersil, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.