Hubert v. Board of Public Utilities
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Burch, J.:
The appeal is from rulings sustaining demurrers of separate defendants to an amended petition filed by the appellant in which it is alleged that he was severely injured by the explosion of an electrical exhauster caused by the negligence of the Board of Public Utilities of Kansas City, Kan. The city was not a party to the action as originally brought but later was named as a necessary party defendant. Two principal questions are involved — Was the board an independent, legal entity which could be sued alone as such? If not, what was the legal…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Board of Directors of Fort Scott Public Library v. City of Fort ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
- Seely v. Board of Public UtilitiesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
3Cited by9 opinions
- Murphy v. City of TopekaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1981
- Toklan Royalty Corp. v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1949
- Burnison v. FrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
- Rizzi v. FanelliDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949
- Allbritten v. National Acceptance Co. of ChicagoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.