Legal Opinion

Succession of Lanata

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 17, 1944No. Nos. 37248, 37359Published

1Opinion of the Court

HAMITER, Justice.

The primary question presented for determination in this litigation — one that is res novo in the jurisprudence of this State —is whether or not a formal judgment of interdiction ipso facto incapacitates the interdict to dispose of his property by donation mortis causa.

Two appeals bring this succession matter before us. In one of the proceedings (No. 37,248) Mrs. Emma Lanata Hermann, a sister of the decedent 'and testator, John Sidney Lanata, is appealing from a judgment that dismissed her suit attacking the will, the court having sustained an exception of no cause of action…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Aubert v. AubertSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1851
  2. Ducasse's Heirs v. DucasseSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
  3. Succession of ReemsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
  4. Succession of ConnorSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
  5. Succession of DahmSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API