Legal Opinion

Jenkins v. Hale

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided August 19, 2008No. CV-08-0208-AP/ELPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BERCH, Vice Chief Justice.

¶ 1 We have been asked to decide whether an elector’s signature on a nominating petition is invalid as a matter of law if the elector provides a post office box address in the address portion of the signature line. We hold that it is not.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2 Albert Hale seeks his party’s nomination for state senator from Legislative District Two. To qualify for the primary ballot, Hale needs 522 valid signatures on his nominating petitions. Hale submitted eighty petition sheets that contained more than 800 signatures from electors in Apache,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Renck v. Superior Court of Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Whitman v. MooreArizona Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Moreno v. JonesArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Adams v. BolinArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Lubin v. ThomasArizona Supreme Court · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  2. Voice of Surprise v. Skip HallArizona Supreme Court · 2023
  3. McClung v. BennettArizona Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Arizona Libertarian Party v. ReaganDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2016
  5. Flood Control District v. Paloma Investment Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API