Legal Opinion

McClung v. Bennett

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided August 6, 2010No. CV-10-0183-AP/ELPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BERCH, Chief Justice.

¶ 1 On June 28, 2010, this Court issued an order affirming the superior court’s judgment in this election case. We now explain the basis for our decision.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶ 2 Michael McClung challenged signatures on Joseph Sweeney’s nominating petitions to appear on the ballot for the United States House of Representatives for Congressional District 7 (CD-7). Sweeney needed 381 valid signatures to qualify for the Republican primary ballot; he turned in petitions bearing 577. McClung’s complaint challenged 282 signatures, identifying them by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Mathieu v. MahoneyArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Lubin v. ThomasArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Jenkins v. HaleArizona Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Mandraes v. HungerfordArizona Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Donald J. Trump v. Joseph R. BidenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Donald J. Trump v. Joseph R. BidenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Leach v. reagan/clean Energy for a Healthy ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Bennett v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
  5. Brocki v. BrockiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API