Legal Opinion

Flood Control District v. Paloma Investment Ltd. Partnership

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 26, 2015No. 1 CA-CV 13-0750PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THOMPSON, Judge:

¶ 1 Flood Control District of Maricopa County (District) appeals from the revised second amended judgment entered on remand after this Court’s decisions in Flood Control District of Maricopa County v. Paloma Investment Ltd. Partnership, 230 Ariz. 29, 279 P.3d 1191 (App.2012). The District contends that the interest rate on the amended judgment is contrary to law, and that the superior court erred in ordering partial payments on the amended judgment to be credited first to interest accrued and then to the remaining principal balance. For the following reasons, we affirm.

F…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Story v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  2. United Services Automobile Ass'n v. MorrisArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Norene R. O'Dell v. United States of America and Jack Ruhter, Trustee in BankruptcyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
  4. Damron v. SledgeArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Unum Life Insurance Co. of America v. CraigArizona Supreme Court · 2001

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. Max WilsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2017
  2. Jeffrey Glasner, Dwight Seeley, Pamela Seeley, Arij Ali, and Malina Ali, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. American Economy Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Personal Insurance Company, and Safeco Insurance Company of IndianaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2026
  3. Red Mountain v. IngleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API