Commonwealth v. Moore
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
ALLEN, J.:
¶ 1 Garrick Moore (“Appellant”) appeals from the trial court order denying his petition for extension of time to file a post-sentence motion. We remand with instructions, and hold that, for reasons of judicial economy and fairness, a defendant who raises ineffective assistance of counsel claims after being found in contempt of a Protection from Abuse order (“PFA”) and sentenced to imprisonment pursuant to 23 Pa.C.SA. § 6114, is entitled to an eviden-tiary hearing on the ineffectiveness of counsel claims, such that the record is *990adequate to assess the claims on direct…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GrantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Commonwealth v. BomarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. DrevesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. BrumbaughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. BarnesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Carrillo-DiazSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. ListonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Com. v. Baldwin, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Com. v. Baldwin, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Com. v. Bower, M., Jr.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.