Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Stallworth

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 4, 2001No. 278 CAPPublishedCited by 130 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ZAPPALA, Justice:

This is a direct appeal pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 722(4) and 9711(h). Appellant, Leroy Stallworth, was convicted by a jury of murder in the first degree and burglary. At the conclusion of the penalty phase of Appellant’s trial, the jury found the existence of two aggravating circumstances: that the defendant committed a killing while in the perpetration of a felony, 42 Pa.C.S. § 9711(d)(6), and that at the time of the killing, the defendant was subject to a court order restricting in any way his behavior towards the victim pursuant to 23 Pa.C.S. Ch. 61 (relating to…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Zant v. StephensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Preston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. United States v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by130 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HairstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. PaddySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Commonwealth v. BoczkowskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Commonwealth v. DrumhellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Commonwealth v. TysonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

125 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API