Legal Opinion

State v. Moore

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided April 16, 1975No. 1875PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HENDLEY, Judge.

Defendant was convicted of larceny of property with a value in excess of $2,500.-00 contrary to § 40A-16-1, N.M.S.A.1953 (2d Repl.Vol. 6, 1972). Timely notice of appeal and a skeleton transcript have been filed. It now appears that due to unexplained technical difficulties, the court reporter is unable to prepare a transcript of proceedings in the cause. The defendant has moved this court for an order reversing the judgment and remanding the case for a new trial. The state, after being given ten days, has not responded to the motion. In the unusual circumstances of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. RomeroNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Richardson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Charles Hartwell Parrott v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
  4. Van Scoyoc v. YorkDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  5. People v. ForemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. McGuireNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Commonwealth v. HarrisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  3. Lopez v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Manlove v. SullivanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Bhutto v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API