Legal Opinion

Charles Hartwell Parrott v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 8, 1963No. 7069_1PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.

The appeal is from a judgment of fine and imprisonment entered on a jury verdict finding the appellant-defendant guilty of conspiracy to rob a bank insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The only point deserving consideration is the effect of a statement by the trial judge in the voir dire examination of prospective jurors that 3 other charges of bank robbery were pending against the defendant.

The voir dire examination was not recorded. After discovery of this fact, counsel for the defendant filed a motion to complete the record and supported that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. William L. Poole v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
  2. Consolidated Gas & Equipment Company of America v. Clarence F. Carver and La Junta Equipment CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
  3. Rufus E. Stephens, Alias Steve Ringo, Alias Stephen Ringo Steel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. HerndonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  2. Commonwealth v. AndersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. State v. BollingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. United States v. John Oliver Hornung, A/K/A John O. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  5. State v. WrightIdaho Supreme Court · 1975

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API