Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Stratton v. Alto Land & Cattle Co.

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided December 18, 1991No. 11333PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MINZNER, Judge.

Defendants Alto Land and Cattle Company (Alto) and James Wimberly (Wimberly) appeal the trial court’s orders allowing the attorney general to file a complaint in intervention and, on the basis of that complaint, requiring them to comply with the provisions of the New Mexico Subdivision Act (Act). 1 We conclude there was substantial evidence to support the court’s determination that both defendants engaged in conduct in violation of the Act. We also conclude that the attorney general was authorized to seek injunctive relief to compel compliance. However, in addressing the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. County of Los Angeles v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. County of Allegheny v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Tapia v. Panhandle Steel Erectors CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Hale v. Basin Motor Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1990

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Coll v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Matter of EvansNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State Ex Rel. Udall v. WimberlyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. State Ex Rel. Udall v. CresswellNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Hurley v. Village of RuidosoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API