Legal Opinion

Hurley v. Village of Ruidoso

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided February 27, 2006No. 25,572PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRY, Judge.

{1} This case presents us with the opportunity to clarify whether municipalities are subject to statutes of limitations. In this declaratory judgment action, Plaintiffs Kennith and Edna Hurley appeal from an order granting summary judgment in favor of the Village of Ruidoso, determining that the Village’s claim of lien was not time barred. The district court reasoned that the statutes of limitations could not be pleaded as a defense against the Village’s claim because the Village was a subdivision of the State of New Mexico, against which statutes of limitations do not run.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Self v. United Parcel Service, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Board of Education, School District 16 v. StandhardtNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Morningstar Water Users Ass'n v. Farmington Municipal School District No. 5New Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State Ex Rel. Stratton v. Alto Land & Cattle Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. State Ex Rel. Udall v. CresswellNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Moongate Water Co. v. DOÑA ANA MUTUAL DOMESTIC WATER CONSUMERS ASS'NNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Rainaldi v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API