Legal Opinion

Mauney v. Morris

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 19, 1985No. 8426SC550Published

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

The initial question that must be addressed is whether appeal of the order denying plaintiffs motion to amend his complaint is premature. General Statutes 1-277 and 7A-27 in effect provide “that no appeal lies to an appellate court from an interlocutory order or ruling of the trial judge unless such ruling or order deprives the appellant of a substantial right which he would lose if the ruling or order is not reviewed before final judgment.” (Citations omitted.) Waters v. Personnel, Inc., 294 N.C. 200, 240 S.E. 2d 338 (1978). An interlocutory order is one made “during the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Waters v. Qualified Personnel, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Bailey v. GoodingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. Fulp v. FulpSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. Carolina Garage, Inc. v. HolstonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API