Legal Opinion

Smith v. Board of Trustees of Barnes City

California Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1926No. Docket No. L.A. 9188PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINLAYSON, J.,

pro term. — This is a proceeding in mandamus brought by an elector of Barnes City to compel respondents to call and provide for the holding of an election of city officers on the second Monday in April, 1926.

On February 13, 1926, pursuant to a special election held on the third day of that month (hereinafter referred to as the incorporation election), Barnes City was incorporated as a city of the sixth class under the provisions of sections 1 to 3, inclusive, of the Municipal Corporation Act (Stats. 1883, p. 93). The respondent Trustees and the other elective officers enumerated…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Donlon v. JewettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Mutual Life Insurance v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. People v. MoroneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Roig Commercial Bank v. BuscagliaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1953
  4. People v. SaffellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. Stolze Lumber Co. v. StrattonIllinois Supreme Court · 1944

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API