Donlon v. Jewett
California Supreme Court
Application to the Supreme Court for a writ of mandamus. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.
The petitioner is assessor and the respondent auditor of Ventura County, and it is the duty of the latter, prescribed by law, to draw his warrant at the end of each month for a monthly installment of the salary of the former. At the end of the month of January, petitioner demanded a warrant for his Jan-*531nary salary, claiming that Ventura was a county of the ihirty-ninth-and-one-half class, and that his annual salary as assessor of a county of that class was three thousand two hundred dollars. But the respondent, being in doubt whether Ventura was, according to a correct construction of the…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Reed Orchard Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Medical Board v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Neutzel v. RyansCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
- Board of Commissioners v. ScanlanIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- People v. SaffellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.