Legal Opinion

American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. Ingram

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 7, 1980No. 15PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUSKINS, Justice:

This appeal poses the question whether Lumbermens Mutual can avoid its insurance contract with defendant appellants because the Health Care Liability Reinsurance Exchange Act was declared unconstitutional. We hold that the facts of this case require a negative answer.

It is a rule of statutory construction that a statute declared unconstitutional is void ah initio and has no effect. Board of Managers v. Wilmington, 237 N.C. 179, 74 S.E. 2d 749 (1953); Idol v. Street, 233 N.C. 730, 65 S.E. 2d 313 (1951); Sessions v. Columbus County, 214 N.C. 634, 200 S.E. 418 (1939); State v.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Norton v. Shelby CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Woods v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Perlstein v. WolkIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State Ex Rel. Barker v. HarmonTennessee Supreme Court · 1994
  3. City of New Bern v. New Bern-Craven County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  4. State ex rel. North Carolina State Board of Registration for Professional Engineers & Land Surveyors v. Testing Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Martin v. Piedmont Asphalt & Paving Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API