Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Barker v. Harmon

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1994PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, Justice.

In this appeal, we are asked to decide whether a private legislative act, 1 which authorized a monthly expense allowance for a General Sessions Judge, violates Article VI, § 7 of the Tennessee Constitution, 2 which prohibits increasing or diminishing judges’ salaries during their term of office.

The trial court found that the expense allowance was an increase in compensation during the judge’s term of office and was, therefore, unconstitutional. The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court, finding that the private act was unconstitutional, but concluded that the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Norton v. Shelby CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Peay v. NolanTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Newton v. CoxTennessee Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Parrott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Taylor v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Planned Parenthood of Middle Tennessee v. SundquistTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Edwards v. AllenTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Memphis Planned Parenthood, Inc. v. Donald Sundquist, Governor of the State of Tennessee, and John Knox Walkup, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  5. State v. BondsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2015

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API