Antarctic Support Associates v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MARGOLIS, Senior Judge.
This bid protest is before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for judgment on the Administrative Record. Plaintiffs seek injunctive and declaratory relief, requesting that the Court declare that the award to defendant-intervenor was arbitrary and capricious and without a rational basis and issue a permanent injunction restraining the United States of America and its agent the National Science Foundation (NSF) from taking any actions to procure goods and services identified in the solicitation. In turn, defendant and defendant-intervenor request that the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Orion International Technologies v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Allied Technology Group, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Bean Stuyvesant, L.L.C. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- North Carolina Division of Services for the Blind v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.