Legal Opinion
Richman v. W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 30, 1997No. 94 Civ. 6397(PKL)PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LEISURE, District Judge.
Plaintiff Janice Richman moves the Court for an order, pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Court’s inherent authority, modifying and revising the Court’s Opinion and Order of March 24, 1995 (the “March 1995 Opinion”). 1 For the reasons stated below, the motion is denied in part and granted in part.
BACKGROUND
This is a product liability’ action against W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. (“Gore”). Plaintiff seeks recovery for injuries allegedly resulting from an artificial ligament (the “Ligament”) purportedly manufactured by…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Dictograph Products Company, Inc. v. Sonotone Corporation, Emil Henry Greibach and S. Michael PinelesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Louis Fennell v. Tlb Kent Company and Joseph PietrykaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Barbara MITCHELL and Gregory Mitchell, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COLLAGEN CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Lakie v. SmithKline BeechamDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- In Re Medtronic, Inc. Sprint Fidelis Leads Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
- In re Rezulin Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Davenport v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- Electric Mobility Corp. v. Bourns Sensors/Controls, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
- Grozdanich v. Leisure Hills Health Center, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.