Legal Opinion

Herron v. Harbour

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 15, 1916No. 6171PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; W. R. Taylor, Judge. Action by T. J. Herron against J. F. Harbour. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

MATHEWS, C.

This was an action for a recovery-upon promissory notes given for the purchase price of a tract of land.. The defense interposed against the notes was a failure of title to the land. Plaintiff sold the land to defendant and executed to him a warranty deed therefor. The defendant claims that no title to the land was ever vested in plaintiff, hence a failure of consideration for the notes sued on. There was no offer of recon-veyance by defendant, either in the pleadings or in the proof. No demurrer was filed against the answer, but at the beginning of the trial, the burden…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Cooper v. SingletonTexas Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Howe v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Ogburn v. WhitlowTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Joiner v. Ardmore Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Pearsoll v. ChapinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1863

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Holcomb & Hoke Mfg. Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Hooks v. Berry-Hart Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Carson v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. International Supply Co. v. Bryan & Emery, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. Young v. GarrettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API