Legal Opinion

International Supply Co. v. Bryan & Emery, Inc.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 20, 1933No. 20774PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOsborn, J.

This action was instituted in the district court of Tulsa county by Bryan & Emery, Inc., as plaintiff, against the Internatonal Supply Company, a corporation, to recover damages for the breach of a written contract to drill a well for oil and gas in Logan county, plaintiff praying for damages in the sum of $125,000. From the allegations of the petition and from the contract, it appears that a well had already been drilled ojj said lands to a depth of ap proximately 4,500 ieet, and that, under the terms of said written contract, the defendant agreed to deepen said hole to the Wilcox sand, or…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Buzard v. HoustonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Mathews v. SniggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  4. Fraley, Adm'r v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  5. Maas v. DunmyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tax/Investments Concepts, Inc. v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Maynard v. Central Nat. Bank of OkmulgeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  3. Appliance Distributors, Inc. v. Mercury Electric Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
  4. Evans v. Bank of F. C. Finerty & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  5. Tax/Investments Concepts, Inc. v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API