Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Wohlfahrt v. Bodette

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided January 28, 1980No. 79-506, 79-843PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonlin, P.J.

William Wohlfahrt and Herbert Dam-row are charged, in separate complaints, with various crimes. At their initial appearance, each reserved all objections to the trial court’s jurisdiction over them. They were released on their personal recognizance with no additional conditions imposed by the court. Each filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenging the jurisdiction of the trial court.

Robert Bodette, respondent to the petitions, filed motions to quash on the ground that the petitioners were not entitled to the writ because they were not restrained of their liberty. The trial court…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Carafas v. LaValleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Jones v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Peyton v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. McCaffrey v. ShanksCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
  2. State Ex Rel. Fuentes v. Wisconsin Court of AppealsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State Ex Rel. Smalley v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
  4. Ezequiel Lopez-Quintero v. Michael A. DittmannWisconsin Supreme Court · 2019
  5. State Ex Rel. Haas v. McReynoldsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API