Legal Opinion

Ezequiel Lopez-Quintero v. Michael A. Dittmann

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 2019No. 2018AP000203-WPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRebecca Grassl Bradley, J.

*483*56¶1 We review the court of appeals' decision to summarily deny as untimely Ezequiel Lopez-Quintero's petition for habeas corpus seeking reinstatement of his right to file a direct appeal. Lopez-Quintero contends his petition satisfied all of the requirements under Wis. Stat. § (Rule) 809.51 (2015-16),1 and the court of appeals erred when it presumed, without ordering a response from the State, that his nine-year delay in filing his petition caused prejudice. We hold that neither the language of Rule 809.51 nor principles of equity require a habeas petitioner to allege timeliness in the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Engle v. IsaacSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Rose v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Chris Hinrichs v. DOW Chemical CompanyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020
  2. State v. Raytrell K. FitzgeraldWisconsin Supreme Court · 2019
  3. State v. Charles L. Neill, IVWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Town of Wilson v. City of SheboyganWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Enbridge Energy Company, Inc. v. Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2019

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API