Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Straus v. Ketchen

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1933No. 6060PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWernette, J.

This is an original application for a writ of mandate to require the defendant, as county treasurer and ex-officio tax collector of Ada county, Idaho, to accept certain bonds of Drainage District No. 2, in Ada county, and cash tendered by petitioners, and issue receipts therefor showing full payment of the assessments for benefits made by the drainage district against petitioners’ lands, described in the petition, and note the full payment thereof on the assessment-roll of said district, pursuant to the provisions of chapter 183, Session Laws 1933. The issues are presented by the petition,…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Hagar v. Reclamation District No. 108Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Von Hoffman v. City of QuincySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  4. Pioneer Irrigation District v. BradleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Meyers v. City of Idaho FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1932

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kelley v. ProutyIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Davis v. McCaslandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. Shouse v. QuinleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. River Farms Co. v. California GibsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. Breckenridge v. JohnstonIdaho Supreme Court · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API