Legal Opinion
Amsterdam Urban Renewal Agency v. Barnett
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 4, 1978Published
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered May 19, 1977 in Montgomery County, which confirmed a report of Commissioners of Appraisal. The present actions involve two parcels of land located in the City of Amsterdam which were condemned by appellant Amsterdam Urban *756Renewal Agency. The first parcel at 48 East Main Street was improved with a three-story brick building and had a frontage of 19.5 feet on East Main Street and a depth of 88 plus or minus feet. The second parcel was immediately behind a right of way in the rear of the first parcel and had a frontage of 62 feet…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Plaza Hotel Associates v. Wellington Associates, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
- In re HuieNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
- County of Sullivan v. EmdenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Shapiro v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Katz v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960