Legal Opinion
Katz v. State
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 28, 1960No. Claim No. 33282PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCoosr, J.
This was a complete taking in fee for arterial high-
way purposes. (Highway Law, art. XII-B.) The Court of Claims awarded claimants the sum of $232,500 as the fair market value of the lands, buildings and improvements, plus the sum of $888.33 as the cost of moving and reinstalling at another location, a car lift, air lines and neon signs. The State originally cross-appealed from the entire judgment on the ground of excessiveness, but has now withdrawn its appeal except for the allowance of the sum of $888.33 above mentioned.
*165The property taken was extremely unusual because of its location, its…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Matter of Board of Water Supply of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Sparkill Realty Corp. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- Sparkill Realty Corporation v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Claim of Riehl v. Town of AmherstNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- McQuade v. Metropolitan St. Ry. Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
3Cited by3 opinions
- Office Park Corp. v. County of OnondagaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Shore Haven Apartments No. 6, Inc. v. Commissioner of FinanceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Amsterdam Urban Renewal Agency v. BarnettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978