Plaza Hotel Associates v. Wellington Associates, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtCooke, J.
Once again, we are called upon to review the valuation given to the realty involved in this action. In the first proceeding (Plaza Hotel Assoc. v Wellington Assoc., 55 Misc 2d 483, affd 28 AD2d 1209, affd 22 NY2d 846), it was held that the appraisers erroneously valued the land at its highest and best use, as if it were vacant, without regard to the fact that the land was encumbered by a lease which restricted the use of the property to hotel purposes only, for a period of up to 50 years. A new appraisal, based upon the land, burdened with the restrictions in the lease, was therefore directed.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Rudman v. Cowles Communications, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Heiman v. BishopNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Sparkill Realty Corp. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- Sparkill Realty Corporation v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- In Re the Petition of ThompsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- W. T. Grant Co. v. SrogiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Schonfeld v. HilliardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Schonfeld v. HilliardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. Flagstar Capital Mkts.New York Court of Appeals · 2018
- Farash v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.