Legal Opinion

In re Huie

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 30, 1956PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFeoessel, J.

This proceeding was commenced under title K of chapter 41 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York, known as the Water Supply Act, to acquire property for the purpose of constructing in Delaware County a reservoir that will provide New York City with an additional supply of *170water. The commissioners of appraisal unanimously awarded claimant $35,000. Because it thought the award was 25% too high, Special Term rejected the commissioners’ report, and ordered a new hearing unless claimant stipulated to accept $28,000. The Appellate Division unanimously reversed, and granted claimant’s…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Matter of Board of Water Supply of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. In Re Acquiring Title by City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. South Buffalo Railway Co. v. KirkoverNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  4. In re City of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  5. People Ex Rel. Parklin Operating Corp. v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1941

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Spitzer v. StichmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
  2. Spitzer v. StichmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
  3. State v. Improved Parcel of LandSuperior Court of Delaware · 1963
  4. Auburn Urban Renewal Agency v. Samuel Schwartz Sons, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  5. County of Sullivan v. EmdenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API