Legal Opinion
Hardcastle v. Western Greyhound Lines
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 16, 1962No. 17843PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMLIN, Circuit Judge.
The appellants are all bus driver employees of Western Greyhound Lines which operates bus lines throughout eleven western states. They brought an action against Western Greyhound Lines and others in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Southern Division, for declaratory relief and an injunction alleging that they were unlawfully deprived of certain seniority rights. Appellees moved to dismiss the appellants’ complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Thereafter the parties presented certain documents to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Steele v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Ford Motor Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Tunstall v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & EnginemenSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Wallace Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Humphrey v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Medlin v. Boeing Vertol Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Gail C. Hass and Michael Hass v. Darigold Dairy Products Co., and Teamsters Union, Local 66Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Larry Lusk v. Eastern Products Corporation, and Local Union No. 75, United Furniture Workers of America, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.