Medlin v. Boeing Vertol Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
JAMES HUNTER, III, Circuit Judge.
1. In this appeal we have raised, sua sponte, the question of subject matter jurisdiction.1 The original action was filed in state court by five employees against their former employer, Boeing Vertol Company. The employer filed a third party action against the union, Local 1069 of the United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, which had represented the employees. The case was removed by the union to federal district court without objection where it was decided on tne merits. Because we conclude that the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- American Fire & Casualty Co. v. FinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. Teleconcepts, Incorporated, Defendant/third-Party v. Bell of Pennsylvania, Third-Party Teleconcepts, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Shamell Samuel-Bassett, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Kia Motors America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Ward Trucking Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Lindsey Hoyt v. Lane Construction CorporatiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.