Matter of Weinroth
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Per curiam
This is an attorney disciplinary case in which the respondent was found to have violated Disciplinary Rule 2-103(C) and Disciplinary Rule 3-102(A). These Rules, respectively, prohibit an attorney from rewarding a lay person who had referred a client to the attorney and from sharing a legal fee with a lay person. A formal ethics committee complaint was filed against respondent on November 22, 1983 charging him with violating these disciplinary rules. Hearings were held by the District XIII Ethics Committee (Committee), which found that respondent violated both Disciplinary Rules. The Committee…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Berlant AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- In Re Opinion No. 415, New Jersey Supreme Court Advisory Committee on Professional EthicsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- In Re Advisory Opinion on Professional Ethics No. 361Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
- In Re Opinion 452 of the Advisory Committee on Professional EthicsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- Gassman v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Matter of ConwaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- In Re the Rules of Professional ConductMontana Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GriffithOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Matter of RutledgeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
- Infante v. GottesmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.